Archive for the ‘Financial’ Category

Getting Best Rates for Hazmat Shipments as New Hours of Service,Retiring Drivers Further Limit Capacity

Thursday, May 3rd, 2012

By John Danielsen, Director of Operations, ChemLogix

As chemical shippers compete for limited truck driver and asset availability to transport hazmat materials, new hours of service regulations issued by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration restrict driver time behind the wheel in an effort to ensure greater safety on the roads.   Effective February (with a compliance date of July, 2013), the maximum number of hours a truck driver can work within a week is now 70 hours, a reduction of 15% from 82 hours.

These new driving restrictions further reduce transportation capacity for chemical shippers not only as truckers drive less, but many will leave the business as they make less money.  With the average age of a truck driver around 55, many also will retire within the next decade without a sufficient replacement of younger drivers.  As a result of truck driver shortages, available carriers for hazmat will start charging more for shipments.   But transportation costs are not totally out of your control.

Getting the best rates for hauling hazmat materials often depends on doing your homework and understanding your options when contracting rates.   While you can establish a hazmat fee as part of your line haul charges, shippers who transport both hazmat and non-hazmat products should obtain quotes shipping non-hazmat materials and then add on a hazmat accessorial charge.  Sometimes, a carrier may suggest a rate that allows you to move both hazmat  and non-hazmat product; but you end up paying too much as you are charged the same rate for non-hazmat loads.  Optimally, it makes more sense to ask for a non-hazmat rate and negotiate a hazmat accessorial fee when applicable.

When negotiating rates, contact at least five carriers and compare costs and contract requirements.  If you find a preferred carrier is more expensive than their competitors, use your market intelligence (competitor rates) to negotiate a better rate.

Don’t have the resources or time to identify and evaluate new potential carriers?  A third-party logistics provider (3PL) specialized in your industry can offers the contract expertise, market intelligence and carrier relationships to establish the best fees for your transportation requirements.  To find out more about Benchmarks and Freight Procurement, refer to ChemLogix web site at http://www.chemlogix.com/solutions/freight-procurement or contact John Danielsen at 215-461-3804.

YouTube Video Discusses Advantages of ISO Tanks to Transport Chemicals

Thursday, January 12th, 2012

Check out our first in a series of videos on important logistics topics of interest to chemical shippers.

Stephen Hamilton, Managing Director of ChemLogix Global, discusses how BulkTainer ISO tanks offer enhanced safety and security for shipping chemicals by taking chemicals off roadways and reducing the incidence of accidents.Click Here.

Having Shipping Capacity Issues? Consider Obtaining Volume Where Capacity Already Exists

Wednesday, January 4th, 2012

By Edward R. Hildebrandt, Sr. VP, Operations

Limited truck driver and asset availability is shrinking shipping capacity for many chemical manufacturers.  Noel Perry, an FTR senior consultant, noted that the industry is several hundred thousand drivers short of raising capacity to meet demand.  Some chemical shippers simply take the route of least resistance and increase capacity by paying more for freight; others may find it nearly impossible to contract new carriers at any price as their competitors vie against them for available resources.

One tactic chemical shippers should consider in meeting freight requirements is identifying and adding volume to an existing carrier’s complementary or empty return lanes.  Load matching carrier’s or other shipper’s lanes in the opposite or complementary direction can add capacity where it doesn’t currently exist.

How can shippers determine where these lanes and volumes exist in the market?  Carriers do not readily provide information regarding their freight, either because they fear the information may wind up in the hands of a competitor who will take the business away or they don’t want shippers to force them to run backhaul lanes at backhaul prices. And many shippers do not have the technology or resources to obtain this market information themselves.

This is where a third-party logistics company adds value.  Knowledgeable about the freight market and supported by transportation management system (TMS) technology, third-party logistics companies can identify available trucking assets in different markets and pinpoint shipper’s freight fits, not just on a aggregate basis, but on a lane specific (original and destination) basis.  Then, the 3PL can electronically broadcast logistics requirements to the market to quickly match capacity to shippers’ needs.  Without a TMS, shippers would have to communicate to carriers through faxes and phone calls, searching for carrier capacity.  Available capacity is left to the chance call and probably would be gone.

Backed with market intelligence and the ability to quickly negotiate with carriers, shippers gain a competitive edge to gain load coverage over other shippers competing for the same available capacity.  To discuss how this strategy might meet your freight requirements, contact ChemLogix at (215) 461-3805 or information@chemlogix.com.

Do Your Carriers Find Your Freight Attractive?

Friday, December 9th, 2011

By Edward R. Hildebrandt, Senior VP, Operations

Next year, the market will still experience a shortage of carriers for freight transport.  While a modest 3 percent growth is forecasted for trucking this year and into 2012, Noel Perry, a FTR senior consultant, notes that capacity might be enough to maintain freight rates but not to replace business lost in the recession.  So, what can carriers do to make their business attractive to carriers?  Sometimes, money is not enough.

If you have a reputation of being a difficult shipper, carriers may avoid your freight.  For instance, do you delay carriers at the plant to load beyond normal loading times?  Or do you move appointments too frequently?  This could create problems for your carrier either meeting your required delivery or causing the carrier to miss their next customer pickup time. In both cases, the driver and carrier lose revenue and, worse yet, may refuse your next shipment.

Perhaps your freight is too dispersed across multiple plant sites to gain capacity and pricing leverage.  Have you thought about consolidating freight at one location prior to shipment or consolidating manufacturing to take advantage of scale? Another answer may be a logistics partner who can combine your freight with that of their other shippers gaining both price and capacity leverage.

How about your payment?  Are they on time and accurate?  Do carriers have to wait long periods until you reconcile your accounts?  Solving these issues and working with existing carriers may be the answer to get more capacity.

Don’t know where to start?  A third-party logistics company with a proven track record of resolving difficult capacity issues can address your particular issues.  As part of the solution, a logistics partner can assist you in making your freight more attractive to carriers.  If you have concerns about finding carrier capacity in the months ahead, contact Chemlogix at (215) 461-3805 or information@chemlogix.com to discuss possible solutions to make your freight more attractive to carriers.

Are Your Products Compliant with the European Union’s new REACH Policies?

Tuesday, October 4th, 2011

As more and more business goes global, chemical shippers must ensure exported products are correctly registered in accordance with different country regulations.  In 2007, the European Union (EU) implemented a new REACH (Registration, Evaluation, Authorization of Chemicals) policy that requires chemical manufacturers and importers to present detailed data on product characteristics and potential risks to health and the environment.  As REACH places greater responsibility on chemical manufacturers to register products and provide safety information, chemical shippers conducting business with EU countries have a limited timeline to ensure their different products comply with regulations or be at risk to incur fines or even a loss of business as materials are rejected for importation.

Registering products under REACH can be a complicated and time-consuming process (REACH requires three different evaluation processes and compliance with different restrictions), especially for companies without an existing EU presence and those not familiar with country protocol.  Other manufacturers with trademark formulas probably are concerned about revealing confidential information during registration.

Using the technology of a qualified third-party consultant can help chemical companies with REACH compliance and reduce the need for in-house personnel to conduct the laborious task of manually reviewing every existing products. Experienced 3PLs, like ChemLogix, also can help specify landing costs and restrictions associated with exporting products to specific countries.

As you enter into new overseas markets or introduce new products into existing ones, ensure products are in compliance with country regulations before the sale.  Understand your profit margins and ensure you can ship to that country.    It’s all a part of a successful and profitable supply chain strategy.

Importers and Exporters Face Difficult Challenges with Ocean Freight

Thursday, July 28th, 2011

Ocean freight rate management is a becoming ever more challenging for importers and exporters, especially smaller-sized shippers.  Frequent changes to ocean freight rates due to market conditions as well as bunker price changes make it more difficult for shippers to accurately price products to overseas customers or make sound sourcing decisions.

At the same time, capacity for ocean freight is unstable as liner carriers plan to lay up container vessels in hopes of increasing rates. The New World Alliance carriers already have announced plans to remove capacity from the Transpacific Trade effective later this month. Beginning during week 29 in Asia, the PSW string will be withdrawn by the VSA. The string is comprised of five vessels, each averaging 3,960 TEU.

Carriers also have different attitudes based on shippers size.  An investigation conducted by maritime analyst SeaIntel (www.SeaIntel.com) revealed that new, small shippers had difficulty getting freight rate quotes from liner carriers and large forwarders. When contacting 33 carriers and forwarders on the Transpacific and 27 on the Asia/Europe lane, the analyst found that a vast majority of liner carriers and large non-vessel-operating common carriers didn’t give rates.

Some carriers and NVOs explained that they needed more company details to provide rates while others just couldn’t provide competitive rates for such small shipments or because they worked in contract environments.  Other carriers didn’t even respond to requests or gave two rates to the same country from two different offices.  ChemLogix Global LLC also has found that carriers may be reluctant to carry hazardous chemical.

Finding a way to work with or even choosing reliable and reasonably-priced overseas carriers can be a major challenge for small- and mid-sized chemical shippers without the experience and resources to conduct negotiations.  Contracting a 3PL with the resources and established carrier contacts can reduce the perils of contract negotiation while ensuring a good rate and the best lanes.

The  ChemLogix Global LLC team has the experience and market knowledge to manage the complex ocean freight market with very competitive pricing.  As a licensed NVOCC and freight forwarder, ChemLogix Global offers competitive rates on international shipments to any port in the world. To find out more about our international logistic services and how we can help manage the ocean freight contracting process, refer to our web site at http://www.chemlogix.com/solutions/international-logistics or contact us at information@chemlogix.com.

Shorter Cash-To Cash-Cycles Will Ensure Chemical Shippers Have Money On Hand as Economy Improves

Monday, April 25th, 2011

As the economy rebounds and business normalizes, companies with healthy cash flows will be in a good position to address corporate expenditures and investments put on hold due to the recession. Those with long cash to cash cycles, however, may find themselves short on cash to fund future operations.

Even with strong sales marked on the books, companies may be cash poor due to long cycles associated with converting resources into cash flow. Inventory management, accounts receivable cycles and accounts payable times are all factors effecting cash to cash cycle times. Today, managing these components has become complex as business goes more global.

For example, when purchasing products from international sources, a chemical company may face a variety of new overseas procurement situations such as expensive letter of credits, logistics problems, and reliability. And when shipping overseas, long payment cycles, often just starting at product receipt, can extend cash payments to more than six months.

Strain on cash can adversely affect companies without adequate supply chain management processes. Chemical companies may need the support of a third-party logistics outsource that has the international experience and technology in implementing supply chain management strategies that may include developing free trade zones, consignment warehouses, customs automated clearinghouses and freight on board destinations.

A 3PL can also offer web-based transportation management system (TMS) technology that automates financial processes and provides visibility into the financial flow, reducing accounts payable times, ensuring greater accuracy and maintaining established accounts receivable time frames. Through better management of the supply chain – from inventory management through to accounts payable – chemical companies can improve cash cycles.

By Francis Ezeuzoh — Chief Financial Officer, ChemLogix, LLC www.chemlogix.com

Did you know the Fuel Surcharge you pay on every load doesn’t cover the out-of -pocket costs of higher fuel cost to your carriers?

Thursday, March 24th, 2011

Why? Fuel surcharge formulas are based on a loaded mile formula. All empty miles run between the terminal and your loading site, such as miles from the carrier’s last delivery to you or miles to the terminal for equipment repairs or tank cleaning, are not included in the fuel surcharge calculation.  As a result, the carrier has added fuel costs for those empty miles. Sure, when you contracted with the carriers, they built in some fuel recovery number for empty miles.  However, recent fuel cost increases (the time from when you negotiated your contracts until now) are not included in those calculations.

What does this mean to you? Let’s review a few examples. Say, during the time of your last contract negotiation, fuel costs increased by $1.50/gallon.  What added cost does that represent?   The average truckload carrier – either dry van or bulk – wants a minimum per-truck revenue of $200K to $225K.   Assuming a modest 10% empty mile to loaded mile ratio for TL van freight and 20% for bulk freight, unrecovered fuel costs is $2,769 for dry van carriers and $5,538 for bulk truck carriers. (Click View Graph below for more)

How do you effectively negotiate during any price increase discussion? Know your carriers empty mile ratio and average truck miles per gallon before you meet. Also, look back at your current contract effective date. Knowing what the fuel price was during your last contract renewal, along with your carrier’s empty mile ratio and average MPG/truck, will enable you to calculate your fuel cost impact on your carriers. You can also be a good partner to your carriers by putting actions in place to minimize empty miles and fuel waste.   As example, initiate a no idle rule at your plant during wait time to load.

View Graph»

TMS Mobile Applications Get Us Closer to Meeting the Rubber on the Road

Tuesday, November 23rd, 2010

Mobile applications for iPhone/iPad and other devices are emerging in ways that can finally close or reduce many of the information gaps between Transportation Planning, the Shipping/Receiving dock, your customers, and even Accounts Payable.  Such applications are enabling shippers to: interface directly and more effectively with logistic partners; access logistics information in non-traditional business settings; and enhance communications where access to a computer is not readily available.

A Sterling (now IBM) Transportation Management System (TMS) Carrier Mobile App already available for the Apple iPhone/iPad gives carriers the ability to communicate directly with a shipper’s TMS, even from the cab of their truck, to respond to shipment tender requests and to report shipment status in real-time.

For one ChemLogix client, this is especially important when it comes to communicating with smaller carriers who do not have EDI systems, including for those owner/operators whose dispatch offices ride in the passenger seats of their tractors.  Trained on the iPhone application, these carriers now are able to immediately respond to tender requests, and once booked on a load to provide pickup, delivery and ETA status updates. Tying these information feeds directly into their TMS system our client is now more frequently using their number one carriers, and gains greater visibility to in-transit inventory status from pickup to delivery.  It’s a win-win situation as carriers are able to respond to tender requests in real time, while on the other side shippers are able to provide enhanced communications to customers for improved service, and fewer surprise calls from customers asking where their shipments are.

Mobile Applications at the Plant/Warehouse

The iPad and other emerging tablet devices create additional opportunities to bring transportation information quickly and easily to its point of greatest impact.  TMS mobile applications currently in development will enable sales reps to retrieve real-time reports and updates on shipment delivery performance.  Rather than rely on last month’s performance reports, sales reps will access the latest data on delivery stats for loads while buying a coffee at Starbucks on their way into a client meeting.  A week-old performance report showing 99% on-time delivery means nothing to the client if three shipments in the past two days were late or missed.  Nothing ruins a sales call faster than bad surprises.

At the plant, on the loading dock, at the guard shack, or in the cab of the pup-truck moving trailers to the dock for loading, iPad/tablet applications will provide real time information and process feedback from workers regarding shipping and receiving appointments, trailer assignments, and guard shack-monitored in-gate/out-gate dates/times.

When it comes down to it, supply chain and transportation optimization and management systems are only as good as the timeliness and accuracy of information delivered to the right place at the right time.  Mobile apps for phones and tablet PC’s now available and in development offer supply chain management the next opportunity to leap forward.

3PLs – Not Banks – Offer Seamless, Paperless Solutions for Freight Audit and Payment

Thursday, April 8th, 2010

About half a century ago, the transportation marketplace was heavily regulated.  Motor carrier bills had to be paid within seven days and rail within five days.  Seeing an opportunity for new business, many banks began to offer freight payment services.   Chemical shippers contracted these services to ensure prompt invoice processing. 

After the deregulation of the transportation industry in 1980, using bank freight payment services  to meet tight deadlines was no longer necessary.   Services also became obsolete as web-based freight audit and payment services became available to chemical shippers.  However, many companies continue to use bank freight payment services out of habit, not for valid economic reasons.

The Banking Freight Payment Process  

The bank’s approach to handling and processing freight payment has not changed in over half a century.  Formulas remain:  “If A equals B, pay.  If not, reject and return back to the company.”   Many banks have even shamelessly bullied carriers to accept a discounted value for receiving payments on time. 

In a banking model, all payments are the same.  For example, cable, telephone and credit card payments are all handled much the same way.  Processing freight invoices for chemicals, however, requires a higher degree of specialization.    Sometimes, it is not just about carrier rates but whether a carrier is qualified to handle chemicals.

3PLs, such as ChemLogix, hold industry certifications that give us the specialized knowledge to understand that when auditing a freight bill, we must not only verify rates but also if the material is being handled according to manufacturer’s specifications and if the carrier has been certified to transport the material.

3PLs Offer Paperless Processing

Supported by world class transportation management systems (TMS), 3PLs also can offer best-in-class freight audit and payment services in a truly paperless environment where documents and data can be transmitted to carriers in a variety of formats (EDI, XML, etc.).  Unlike banks where general ledger code information is limited, TMS capabilities give 3PLs the technology to work in an automated, always current environment that provides customers and carriers with relevant information on a real-time basis from many devices including mobile device applications such as Iphones®.  Banks typically offer limited access to information.  

Companies that use banks to handle their freight audit and payment are finding that they are still heavily involved in the process.   And in most cases, shippers are not achieving expected savings. As banks use similar tactics when processing bills for different industries, they do not have industry data to handle exceptions on their own.  As a result, exception rates run as high as 20 percent, with chemical shippers having to get involved with resolving most of these exceptions while paying for additional handling fees by banks. 

3PLs, like ChemLogix, have access to advanced, multi-relational databases that include information such as fuel surcharge tables, freight rates  and accessorial costs that help resolve many exceptions without going to the customer.   ChemLogix’ customers experience less than five percent exceptions, with most handled by our experienced logistics team without getting the customer involved with problem resolution.  For those times when exceptions cannot be readily resolved, a collaborative exception resolution capability via network interface affords real-time electronic communications to customers instead of faxes and emails.

Taking the time to compare bank vs. 3PL services related to freight audit and payment can save a chemical shipper substantial processing time and money while improving relationships with carriers.  Even if your current process seems to be working well, it is worth taking the time to evaluate the benefits of new processing options for freight audit and payment.